Delhi Liquor Policy Case: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has made a big claim regarding Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. The central investigation agency said that he was misleading the ED. This is the reason why the investigating agency is still investigating the role of the Delhi CM in this scam.Â
The ED’s remand application said that 55-year-old Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) convenor Arvind Kejriwal did not share passwords.
Let us know in 10 points what has come out through the investigating agency’s remand application regarding the Delhi CM:Â
1- Evasive Answers Alleged: ED claims Kejriwal gave evasive answers and concealed information during questioning, according to their plea seeking judicial custody.
2- Confronted with Statements: Kejriwal allegedly confronted with statements of eyewitnesses, approvers, and co-accused during his nine-day custodial interrogation.
3- False Evidence Allegations: ED alleges Kejriwal gave false evidence about other AAP members, calling them confused when confronted with their statements.
4- AAP Communication In-charge: Kejriwal allegedly claimed that AAP’s communication in-charge reported to his cabinet colleagues, not to him directly.
5- Ignorance Claimed: Kejriwal claimed ignorance about persons working in his camp office, including why Vijay Nair was staying in a minister’s bungalow.
6- Vijay Nair’s Role: ED alleges Vijay Nair arranged a video call between Sameer Mahendru and Kejriwal, claiming Vijay was his confidante.
7- Meetings with Co-accused: Kejriwal allegedly evaded questions about Nair’s authority to attend meetings with liquor business stakeholders.
8- Digital Device Passwords: Kejriwal reportedly did not share passwords of his digital devices, hindering evidence collection.
9- Hawala Transfer Allegations: ED claims Kejriwal was shown evidence of hawala transfer of Rs 45 crore to Goa for AAP’s campaign.
10- Influential Status: ED argues against Kejriwal’s release, citing his influence and potential to tamper with evidence or influence witnesses.
