BJP CM Faces: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has built a reputation for surprising political analysts and the public by appointing relatively unknown leaders as Chief Ministers. This trend, which began after Narendra Modi became Prime Minister in 2014, continues to this day, with Delhi’s Rekha Gupta being the latest example.
But why does BJP avoid experienced and well-known leaders for the CM position? Does this strategy strengthen the party, or could it backfire in the long run? Let’s break it down.
Table of Contents
How Did This Trend Start?
In 2014, after a landslide victory in the Lok Sabha elections, Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister, and Amit Shah took charge as the party’s national president. Their leadership marked a strategic shift in the way BJP appointed Chief Ministers.
Just five months after the general elections, BJP won assembly polls in Maharashtra and Haryana. Instead of selecting veteran leaders for the CM posts, the party surprised everyone by picking first-timers: Manohar Lal Khattar in Haryana and Devendra Fadnavis in Maharashtra.
Since then, this approach has become a pattern. The latest example is Rekha Gupta in Delhi, a first-time MLA chosen over senior leaders like Pravesh Verma, son of former CM Sahib Singh Verma.
BJP CM Faces: Where Has BJP Implemented This Strategy?
BJP has repeated this tactic in several states over the years:
- Uttar Pradesh (2017): Yogi Adityanath was chosen over senior leaders like Keshav Prasad Maurya and Manoj Sinha.
- Madhya Pradesh (2023): Mohan Yadav replaced veteran Shivraj Singh Chouhan.
- Rajasthan (2023): Bhajanlal Sharma, a first-time MLA, was preferred over Vasundhara Raje.
- Chhattisgarh (2023): Vishnudev Sai, a lesser-known leader, was made CM.
- Haryana (2024): Nayab Singh Saini replaced Manohar Lal Khattar just months before elections.
This trend clearly indicates a deliberate strategy by the BJP leadership.
BJP CM Faces: How the BJP surprised by appointing different Chief Ministers across 13 states over 11 years
| S.No. | State | Year | Chief Minister |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haryana | 2014 | Manohar Lal Khattar |
| 2 | Maharashtra | 2014 | Devendra Fadnavis |
| 3 | Jharkhand | 2014 | Raghubar Das |
| 4 | Manipur | 2017 | N. Biren Singh |
| 5 | Uttar Pradesh | 2017 | Yogi Adityanath |
| 6 | Goa | 2019 | Pramod Sawant |
| 7 | Assam | 2021 | Himanta Biswa Sarma |
| 8 | Uttarakhand | 2021 | Pushkar Singh Dhami |
| 9 | Madhya Pradesh | 2023 | Mohan Yadav |
| 10 | Chhattisgarh | 2023 | Vishnudev Sai |
| 11 | Rajasthan | 2023 | Bhajan Lal Sharma |
| 12 | Haryana | 2024 | Nayab Singh Saini |
| 13 | Delhi | 2025 | Rekha Gupta |
Why BJP Prefers New Faces Over Popular Leaders
BJP CM Faces: There are two major reasons behind this move:
1. Maintaining Modi’s Central Leadership
Before 2014, BJP had multiple strong regional leaders, such as Shivraj Singh Chouhan in MP and Vasundhara Raje in Rajasthan. However, since Modi became Prime Minister, the party has shifted towards a centralized leadership model, where the focus remains on Modi’s image rather than individual state leaders.
By appointing fresh faces, the BJP ensures that no CM becomes powerful enough to challenge the authority of Modi and Shah. This helps them maintain complete control over state governments while keeping national elections focused on Modi’s leadership.
2. Transitioning Leadership to a Younger Generation
Most of the new CMs appointed by BJP are in their mid-50s. This ensures long-term leadership in the states, similar to how leaders like Modi, Vasundhara Raje, and BS Yediyurappa dominated state politics for decades. BJP’s strategy is to groom a new batch of leaders who can carry the party forward for the next 15-20 years.
BJP CM Faces: What Other Factors Influence These Appointments?
Apart from maintaining central control and ensuring generational change, BJP also considers other factors:
1. Caste and Regional Calculations
BJP has been expanding its voter base beyond its traditional support groups. In 2009, only 18.6% of OBCs voted for BJP, but this number jumped to 44% in 2019 and remained steady in 2024. To further consolidate its hold over various caste groups, BJP has been strategically selecting CMs from different backgrounds.
For instance, Haryana’s Nayab Singh Saini belongs to the OBC category, a crucial voter bloc. Similarly, Vishnudev Sai in Chhattisgarh comes from a tribal community, helping BJP strengthen its outreach among ST voters.
2. Party Loyalty and Internal Control
BJP prefers leaders who are loyal to the high command rather than those with independent political influence. This is why leaders like Vasundhara Raje and Shivraj Singh Chouhan, who had their own mass followings, were replaced with lesser-known figures who are more likely to follow central leadership directives without resistance.
3. Sending a Message to Party Workers
By appointing relatively unknown leaders as CMs, BJP signals that anyone, regardless of their past influence, can rise through the ranks based on party discipline and loyalty. This helps in keeping workers motivated and ensures that no faction within the party becomes too powerful.
Has This Strategy Been Used Before in Indian Politics?
Yes, a similar approach was seen during Indira Gandhi’s tenure as Prime Minister. In the 1970s and 1980s, she sidelined strong regional leaders and frequently changed Chief Ministers to ensure that no one became too powerful. This led to Congress weakening at the grassroots level, ultimately contributing to its decline in later decades.
Political analysts have drawn parallels between Indira Gandhi’s strategy and Modi’s current approach, raising concerns that BJP might face similar long-term consequences.
BJP CM Faces: Can This Strategy Backfire on BJP?
While this approach has helped BJP maintain strong control over state governments, there are potential risks:
- Lack of Strong Regional Leadership: If BJP continues to replace experienced leaders with newcomers, it could weaken its grassroots presence, similar to what happened with Congress.
- Voter Discontent: If new CMs fail to meet public expectations, BJP could face backlash in state elections.
- Internal Discontent: Senior leaders sidelined for new faces might become dissatisfied and create internal conflicts within the party.
BJP CM Faces: Calculated Move!
BJP’s strategy of appointing new and lesser-known leaders as Chief Ministers is a calculated move to maintain central control, transition leadership to a younger generation, and balance caste equations. While this approach has been successful in consolidating Modi’s dominance, it carries potential risks that could impact the party in the long run.
Will this strategy help BJP maintain its grip on Indian politics, or will it lead to challenges like Congress faced in the past? Only time will tell.
Also read:
